Posts tagged ‘state media’

May 24, 2012

US state dept report 2011: Freedom of Speech and PressStatus of Freedom of Speech and Press in Sri Lanka

by sd

The law provides for freedom of speech, including for members of the press, but the government did not respect these rights in practice. Government officials criticized, pressured, harassed, and arrested members of the media, and most journalists practiced self-censorship.

The LLRC report stated that it was “deeply disturbed by persistent reports concerning attacks on journalists and media institutions and killing of journalists and the fact that these incidents remained to be conclusively investigated and perpetrators brought to justice…[a]ny failure to investigate and prosecute offenders would undermine the process of reconciliation and the [r]ule of [l]aw.” The LLRC recommended steps be taken to prevent harassment and attacks on media personnel and institutions and priority be given to investigate and prosecute those responsible for such incidents.

Freedom of Speech: The constitution protects the right to free speech. However, it is subject to a host of restrictions including public morality and national security. The government attempted to impede criticism through the year, including through harassment, intimidation, violence, and imprisonment. The government monitored political meetings, particularly in the north and east. There also were credible reports that civilian and military officials questioned local residents and groups who met with foreign diplomats regarding the content of their meetings.

Freedom of Press: The government owned one of the country’s largest newspaper chains, two major television stations, and a radio station. However, private owners operated a variety of independent newspapers, journals, and radio and television stations. The government imposed no political restrictions on the establishment of new media enterprises. However, the government restricted the construction of transmission towers in the north. It built a new tower in the Vanni but blocked private stations from building towers.

Violence and Harassment: National and international media freedom organizations and journalists’ associations expressed concern over restrictions on media freedom and were sharply critical of the government’s role in harassing and intimidating journalists.

Senior government officials repeatedly accused critical journalists of treason and often pressured editors and publishers to print stories that portrayed the government in a positive light. This pressure reportedly was exerted sometimes directly through threats and intimidation. For example, international media reported that President Rajapaksa personally telephoned the chairman of The Sunday Leader, Lal Wickrematunge, on July 19, about an article reporting that China had given money to the president and his son to be used “at their discretion.” Approximately 100 posters with the words “Do not lie!” and “The gods will punish you” appeared on the walls of the newspaper’s headquarters.

Although no journalist was reported killed or abducted during the year, frequent threats, harassment, and attacks on media personnel continued. Statements by government and military officials contributed to an environment in which journalists who published articles critical of the government felt under threat.

At an event in Katunayake on November 20, Public Relations and Public Affairs Minister Mervyn Silva stated that there were “lowly so-called journalists who insult important persons” and that they should book coffins for themselves.

In a September 1 telephone conversation, UPFA southern provincial council member Aruna Gunaratne threatened to kill Daily Mirror Matara correspondent Krishan Jeewaka Jayaruk if he published a story about Gunaratne. Jayaruk recorded the conversation and filed a complaint regarding the death threat with the Matara police.

On July 29, unidentified men attacked news editor Gnanasundaram Kuhanathan of the Jaffna-based Uthayan newspaper with iron rods. On August 15, police arrested two suspects, including one described as a “major underworld figure,” although some expressed doubts about the suspects. The case was filed in the Jaffna Magistrate’s Court, and at year’s end the Attorney General’s Office was considering filing charges against the suspects. Uthayancame under attack repeatedly in past years, and several of its journalists were killed.

On January 31, unknown perpetrators firebombed the premises of pro-opposition news Web site Lanka-e-news. While numerous observers implicated government agents in the attack, state media suggested that the staff of Lanka-e-news was responsible. Authorities arrested Lanka-e-news editor Bennet Rupasinghe and journalist Shantha Wijesooriya and subsequently released them in the following months, and a magistrate’s court suspendedLanka-e-news operations from April 28 to May 12 because of a contempt case pending against Wijesooriya.

There was no progress in the investigation of the July 2010 arson attack on the Siyatha television premises.

Censorship or Content Restrictions: Police, under the authority of the Ministry of Defense, reportedly maintained a special unit to monitor and control all references in the media to members of the Rajapaksa family. Official pressure reportedly was exerted sometimes through orders to government and private firms to cease advertising in critical newspapers. While media could operate freely, independent and opposition media practiced self-censorship. Media freedom suffered from severe government pressure throughout the island, and most journalists practiced self-censorship, particularly on the issues of accountability and criticism of government officials.

A popular Sinhala language political satire, And Company,which portrayed the government as a company, received threats early in the year. The producer and main actor were threatened by a group in a white van and subsequently removed the character Chinthana (representing President Rajapaksa) from the program.

Libel Laws/National Security: In 2009 the government officially reactivated the Press Council Act of 1973. This act, which includes power to impose punitive measures including fines and lengthy prison terms, proscribes the publishing of articles that discuss internal communications of the government, decisions of the cabinet, matters relating to the military that could affect national security, and details of economic policy that could lead to artificial shortages or speculative price increases.

Nongovernmental Impact: Progovernment paramilitary groups/gangs inhibited freedom of expression, particularly in the north. Members of the EPDP allegedly were involved in harassment and attacks on journalists, including the July 29 attack on Uthayan’s Kuhanathan.

Internet FreedomThe government restricted access to the Internet, including Web sites it deemed pornographic as well as Web sites it deemed critical of the government. There were suspicions that the government was behind the blocking of Internet access to several Tamil news Web sites, including the pro-LTTE TamilNet. On October 18, major Sri Lankan telecom companies Sri Lanka Telecoms and Mobitel blocked access to lankaenews.com, a sensationalist news Web site critical of the government. On June 20, the government temporarily blocked citizen journalism site groundviews.org; groundviews’ Sinhala partner site, vikalpa.org; Transparency International Sri Lanka’s Web site; and news aggregator infolanka.com. Some observers believed the one-day shutdown to be a warning to the sites. On November 5, the Ministry of Mass Media and Information announced that it requires all Web sites carrying Sri Lankan news to register. It based its action on “complaints” about material published by certain Web sites that were “injurious to the image of the country, the head of the state, ministers, senior public officials, and other important persons.” The ministry began blocking sites carrying news critical of the government. Of the five sites blocked, four remained blocked at year’s end.

Academic Freedom and Cultural EventsThere were allegations that university officials, in many cases from the ranks of academia, prevented professors from criticizing government officials. Some academics noted that the environment of intimidation led to self-censorship. There also were concerns of military encroachment into universities. For example, on September 22, a group of academics issued a statement protesting a decision by the Higher Education Ministry to hand over the security of universities to Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd, a government-owned commercial security venture established under the Ministry of Defense and under the direct supervision of the defense secretary. Observers also expressed concerns regarding a mandatory week-long leadership training program held in army camps around the country for students who qualified to enter universities. The training program began May 23 and was conducted by the military under the supervision of university authorities. On June 3, the Supreme Court rejected without trial five petitions that requested the annulment of the leadership training program.

On October 16, in Jaffna an unidentified group assaulted Jaffna University Students’ Association leader Subramaniyam Thavapalasingham with iron rods. The attackers reportedly asked him whether he wanted a separate state. Another student, Rajavarothayan Kavirajan, who had protested against the assault of Thavapalasingham, was allegedly attacked by a military intelligence unit in Kilinochchi October 24. He was seriously injured and admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Jaffna Teaching Hospital. At year’s end the investigation into the attack had identified no suspects.

Read the full report is here

May 6, 2012

Best interests of the media served by providing true and accurate information: SLRC head

by sd

Press Freedom Day marked with panel discussion
Thursday at the Sri Lanka Press Institute (SLPI) to mark World Press Freedom Day under the theme ‘New Voices: Media Freedom Helping to Transform Societies’.

Several veteran journalists and senior media professionals took part in the panel discussion. They included Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation Chairman Mohan Samaranayake, Lakbima News Editor and Editors’ Guild of Sri Lanka representative Rajpal Abeynayake, Lakshman Gunasekara, representative of the South Asia Free Media Association (SAFMA), Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA) representative Ranga Jayasuriya and Free Media Movement (FMM) representative Ms. Dileesha Abeysundara.

The discussion was moderated by Daily Mirror Editor Ms. Champika Liyanaarchchi. The discussion concentrated on the issues of practising media freedom nationally and globally emphasizing on the emergence, impact and the expansion of new media in the modern world. The launching of the source book for journalists also took place at the event.

Mr. Abeynayake said that the impuissance of the media itself has led to the limitations in media freedom and said it is important for the media to look inwards to solve their own woes in reporting before looking into the other aspects of professional journalism.

Mr. Samaranayake shed light on the matter of the media being biased to certain entities. He said that even though the so called ‘Arab Spring’ and talks about regime change are taking place a great deal nowadays, no proper social or political transformation is visible. He shared the view that the best interests of the media are served by providing true and accurate information.

“As long as the media is a profit making enterprise, there can never be media freedom” Mr. Samaranayake said. SAFMA representative Mr. Gunasekara said that the new media plays an important role by engaging in the service of providing information to people but there should be a standardization of media since there are many novel ways to express ideas such as citizen journalism which is often subjective.

FMM representative Ms. Abeysundara said that while there is a transformation of people from traditional media to new media but also stated that there is a slow expansion and development of new media in Sri Lanka. She said that during the thirty year ethnic conflict in the country, freedom of expression was violated numerous times.

She said that the media did not present any effective reports on certain issues such as the LLRC recommendations, the 18th Amendment to the Constitution and the post-war issues. No discussions on these issues were presented by the media. Media are the responsible stakeholders for the loss of media freedom, she said.

SLWJA representative Mr. Jayasuriya spoke on the lack of investigation into abductions and killings of media professionals for doing their job. He said that the media is not only an information providing mechanism but also a balancing entity between the judiciary and executive parties.

There was a question and answer session during the discussions with the active participation of the audience.
ST

March 23, 2011

Lake House, editor ordered to pay Rs. 500 m to Wijedasa Rajapaksha

by sd


Wednesday, 23 March
Lake House and Silumina editor Karunadasa Sooriyarachchi have been ordered by courts to pay Rs. 500 million as compensation to UNP MP Wijedasa Rajapaksha.

Colombo additional district court judge T.D. Gunasekara issued the order today (Mar. 23) after considering a defamation case filed by the MP.

The petitioner alleged that Silumina had published the defamatory article on 14 November 2007, just four days after he left the UPFA and joined the UNP.

The court decided the petitioner had proved the charge beyond doubts.

MP Karu Jayasuriya, Ven. Maduluwawe Shobhitha, Ven. Banagala Upatissa and Ven. Kiniyawala Palitha Theras submitted evidence by affidavits on behalf of the petitioner.

Mr. Rajapaksha was represented by presidents counsel Romesh de Silva and attorney Sugath Caldera.

Sri Lanka Mirror

March 18, 2011

Misuse of state resources including media regrettable – EC

by sd

EC Disanayaka

The Elections Commissioner issuing a statement regarding the recently concluded Local Government elections stated that it was regrettable how some political parties and groups conducted themselves both before and during the polls and stated that the misuse of State Resources and State owned media was also regrettable.

However he added that concluded polls were conducted in a fairly pleasant atmosphere when compared to polls in previous local authority elections.
Daily Mirror

March 13, 2011

Dues To SLRC Amount To Rs. 42 Million – Air Time For Election Campaigns

by sd

Dues amounting to millions of rupees are yet to be recovered by Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation (SLRC) from airtime for election campaigns, and once again the government is the main culprit behind the abuse of state resources.

The dues to the SLRC from airtime for election campaigns stand at a staggering Rs. 42,640,586 (approximately Rs. 42 million) as at July 27, 2010. The airtime had been allocated to parties affiliated to the governing UPFA. The Parliamentary Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) had in August 2010 maintained that there is inefficiency in collecting cash from debtors by the Corporation.

Read the full story here

March 10, 2011

State run daily plays down assassination attempt on TNA MP

by sd

AFTA_Media_release_on__Sritharan_MP090311
Jaffna district Tamil National Alliance (TNA) parliamentarian S. Sritharans shooting incident in Nochchiyagama on March 7th, received minimal coverage in the state run leading Sinhala newspaper Dinamina, sources in Colombo said. Dinamina carried the report in page-4 with minimal details of the incident.

S. Sritharan, narrowly escaped from a group of attackers who lobbed two hand grenade targeting his vehicle and fired at the vehicle using pistols from behind Monday evening around 6:00 p.m.

The parliamentarian was on his way from Vavuniyaa to Colombo to attend the Tuesday sittings in SL parliament. No one was hurt in the attack, SL Police in Anuradhapura said.

Tamil Net

March 6, 2011

ITNs Match Fixing Bombshell

by sd

the hate speech writer Mahinda Abeysundara

By Dinouk Colombage

The two dismissals that ITN found suspicious, Zeros, not heroes according to ITN and Mahinda Abeysundara wrote the script alleging that Mahela Jayawardene and Tilan Samaraweera sold the game for money

As Sri Lankan supporters around the world recovered from a disappointing loss to Pakistan on Saturday, March 26, in the ongoing ICC Cricket World Cup, the state-owned Independent Television Network aired what has now turned into a highly controversial programme, alleging Sri Lanka lost the match to Pakistan for financial gain. A telecast on ITN the next day on its political and current affairs programme Vimasuma for which the script was written by the editor of the state owned Dinamina newspaper, Mahinda Abeysundara, accused Mahela Jayawardene and Thilan Samaraweera of match-fixing.

http://www.thesundayleader.lk/2011/03/06/itn%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%98match-fixing%E2%80%99-bombshell/

March 1, 2011

Cricket World Cup: Jayawardene outraged by TV remark

by sd

Mahela Jayawardana

BBC

Sri Lanka vice-captain Mahela Jayawardene is considering legal action in response to commentary that implied he was guilty of match-fixing.

A state television broadcast suggested Jayawardene deliberately played badly for financial gain in Saturday’s Cricket World Cup defeat by Pakistan.

Jayawardene said his lawyer was drafting a letter to “get to the bottom” of the accusation. The allegation was also levelled at batsman Thilan Samaraweera.

Sri Lanka lost the game against Pakistan by 11 runs, with Jaywardene scoring two runs while Samaraweera scored one.

A commentary on Sunday on Sri Lankan state TV network, ITN, written by the editor of a state newspaper, Mahinda Abeysundara, said a businessman had bet about 18,000 dollars on a Pakistan victory and that there had therefore been what he called a “chorus to change the game”.The commentary was accompanied by slow-motion extracts from the match, sad music and blurry shots implying financial impropriety.

Read the full story here

January 16, 2011

Silumina Editor suggests President to act against websites that criticize GOSL

by sd

President and editors

According to trusted sources, the Editor of the state run newspaper Silumina, Karunadasa Sooriyarachi had suggested to the President Mahinda Rajapakse to take action against websites which are unduly criticizing the the Sri Lankan Government.

Sooriyarachi has made this proposal to the President at a meeting of the chiefs of the media Institutions held on the 13th at the Temple Trees headed by HE the President.

This Editor has directly asked from the President why such action is not being initiated. He had added that these websites are attacking the Govt., the country, the Presidents family and sometimes his own Institution, and therefore why measures should not be taken against those websites.

The President who had in the past proclaimed that he is a friend of the media, leaving aside friend foe relationship, had intently listened to this fawner of an Editors request.

The President had then said that, he is also aware of that situation, and that cannot be allowed to prevail. But, if steps are taken to curb and control the media, they would launch a campaign that undemocratic measures are being taken to stifle the media, and freedom of the media is being undermined.

“They would tell the whole world not to grant the GSP plus to this failed Government, while publishing irresponsible reports like the false information that the Chief justice (CJ) is going to resign, and I, after the second swearing in had not met the CJ”, the President had added.

The President was showing a copy of the news report published in Lanka News Web about the resignation letter handed over by the Chief Justice to the President.

(The Lanka News Web had meanwhile stated, Although the President had made such a statement, we still stand by the veracity of the story published by us. We would also like to emphasize the fact that the Chief Justice had not yet made any comment about the matter.)

A Seperate unit to hunt down the operators

The President had also noted, that websites are publishing anti Government news and specially attacking the Forces. Some websites are being operated from outside the country and are being helped by those in Sri Lanka.There is a separate unit investigating these websites, and after the information is received following the investigation, action will be instituted against them, President noted.

September 7, 2010

Threats Against Exiled Journalists Family in Sri Lanka Must Cease

by sd

Threats Against Exiled Journalists Family in Sri Lanka Must Cease
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) is outraged at continuing threats against the wife of journalist Gamini Pushpakumara, in exile from Sri Lanka since April after being dismissed as a producer with the state-owned Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation (SLRC) in January.
The IFJ calls on the Sri Lankan authorities to identify those responsible for threats against Pushpakumaras wife, Waruni Balasooriya, and to guarantee her safety, IFJ General Secretary Aidan White said.

In July, the IFJ noted earlier threats made to the life of Balasooriya, who remains in Sri Lanka. Balasooriya lodged a complaint at a local police station, but by all accounts it was not acted upon.

Balasooriya has since shifted house for her own safety. However, on the evening of September 2 she had two unidentified visitors who spoke menacingly and vowed to find and kill Pushpakumara.

The two reportedly referred to Pushpakumara as a traitor and a Sinhala Tiger in reference to the Tamil Tigers who were defeated in 2009 after a long civil war. He was accused of sending video footage and photographs of the last phases of the war to overseas media organisations with intent to entangle the Government of Sri Lanka in war crimes trials.

The threatening visitors accused Pushpakumara of acting in concert with General Sarath Fonseka, who was commander of the Sri Lankan army in the last phase of the war and challenged President Mahinda Rajapakse in presidential elections in January. Fonseka was arrested shortly after he lost the election in a polarised national vote, and recently stripped of his rank, pension and all benefits by a military court which found him guilty of conduct unbecoming.

Pushpakumaras dismissal followed his leadership of a movement of SLRC staff demanding that prescribed norms on fair coverage for all candidates be followed by the state broadcaster, which was accused of tilting strongly toward the incumbent president.

The IFJ learns that Balasooriya has again complained to her local police station about the latest threats to her life, and encountered an uncooperative attitude from officials.

The safety of Pushpakumaras wife is a key indicator of the commitment of President Rajapakses regime, now invested with a fresh mandate, to restore the civil liberties that were seriously eroded during the civil war, White said.

Pushpakumaras actions as a leader of the program producers association in SLRC were in line with prescribed norms of fairness in election coverage. Threats implying he was involved in the discovery of visual evidence of atrocities by Sri Lankan armed forces is consistent with a pattern of victimisation that began as retribution for his stand on a matter of professional ethics.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.